Poland vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Poland
8.79 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
7.18 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Poland rank
13th
Serbia rank
14th

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Poland
  • Serbia
2.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B12.5B199520072020

How they compare

Poland currently reports 8.79 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 7.18 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 1.61 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Poland ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 14th of 148 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.95 billion real chained 2019 US$ 13.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ 11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 5.45 billion real chained 2019 US$ 9.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.01 billion real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 8.79 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.18 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.61 billion real chained 2019 US$ Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Poland or Serbia?
Poland, at 8.79 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 7.18 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Poland and Serbia?
1.61 billion real chained 2019 US$, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Poland and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Poland ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 14th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/poland/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/poland/serbia/">Poland vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.