Philippines vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Philippines
6.52 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
7.18 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
16th
Serbia rank
14th

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Philippines
  • Serbia
4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B12.0B14.0B199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 7.18 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 6.52 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines, a difference of 665.81 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 14th of 147 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 4.56 billion real chained 2019 US$ 13.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.64 billion real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 4.92 billion real chained 2019 US$ 9.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.54 billion real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 6.52 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.18 billion real chained 2019 US$ 665.81 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Philippines or Serbia?
Serbia, at 7.18 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 6.52 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Philippines and Serbia?
665.81 million real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Philippines ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 14th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/philippines/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/philippines/serbia/">Philippines vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.