Montenegro vs Slovakia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Montenegro
416.69 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Slovakia
334.83 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro rank
41st
Slovakia rank
42nd

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Montenegro
  • Slovakia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 416.69 million real chained 2019 US$ against 334.83 million real chained 2019 US$ in Slovakia, a difference of 81.86 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Slovakia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Slovakia ahead.

Montenegro ranks 41st and Slovakia ranks 42nd of 148 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Slovakia Difference Ahead
2000s 416.93 million real chained 2019 US$ 647.70 million real chained 2019 US$ 230.77 million real chained 2019 US$ Slovakia
2010s 414.29 million real chained 2019 US$ 457.88 million real chained 2019 US$ 43.59 million real chained 2019 US$ Slovakia
2020s 416.69 million real chained 2019 US$ 334.83 million real chained 2019 US$ 81.86 million real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Montenegro or Slovakia?
Montenegro, at 416.69 million real chained 2019 US$ against 334.83 million real chained 2019 US$ in Slovakia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Montenegro and Slovakia?
81.86 million real chained 2019 US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Slovakia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Montenegro and Slovakia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Montenegro ranks 41st and Slovakia ranks 42nd of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Slovakia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/montenegro/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/montenegro/slovak-republic/">Montenegro vs Slovakia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.