Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Mauritius
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mauritius rank
60th
Sri Lanka rank
60th

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.81199520072020

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 148 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2000s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2010s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2020s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
Mauritius, at 0 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
0 real chained 2019 US$, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Mauritius ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/mauritius/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/mauritius/sri-lanka/">Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.