Kyrgyzstan vs Malaysia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Kyrgyzstan
838.91 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malaysia
1.25 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
34th
Malaysia rank
31st

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Malaysia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B199520072020

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 1.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 838.91 million real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 409.13 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.5 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 148 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 701.96 million real chained 2019 US$ 20.98 million real chained 2019 US$ 680.98 million real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2000s 701.28 million real chained 2019 US$ 19.56 million real chained 2019 US$ 681.72 million real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2010s 783.54 million real chained 2019 US$ 754.54 million real chained 2019 US$ 29.00 million real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 838.91 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ 409.13 million real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Kyrgyzstan or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 1.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 838.91 million real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia?
409.13 million real chained 2019 US$, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Malaysia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/malaysia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Malaysia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.