Guatemala vs Sudan: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Guatemala
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sudan
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
60th
Sudan rank
60th

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sudan
00.20.40.60.81199520072020

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan, a difference of 0 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 60th and Sudan ranks 60th of 147 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”
2020s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ 0 real chained 2019 US$ β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Guatemala or Sudan?
Guatemala, at 0 real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Guatemala and Sudan?
0 real chained 2019 US$, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Sudan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Guatemala ranks 60th and Sudan ranks 60th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sudan: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-coal-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/sudan/">Guatemala vs Sudan: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.