Suriname vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal
Suriname
0 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
0 current US$
in 2020
Suriname rank
50th
Sweden rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time
- Suriname
- Sweden
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 50th and Sweden ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Suriname or Sweden?
- Suriname, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Suriname and Sweden?
- 0 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Sweden?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Suriname and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
- Suriname ranks 50th and Sweden ranks 50th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.