Romania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal
Romania
719.59 million current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
721.42 million current US$
in 2020
Romania rank
26th
Zimbabwe rank
25th
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time
- Romania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 721.42 million current US$ against 719.59 million current US$ in Romania, a difference of 1.83 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Romania ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 150 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.60 million current US$ | 307.63 million current US$ | 257.03 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 2.37 billion current US$ | 2.54 billion current US$ | 160.68 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2.79 billion current US$ | 3.38 billion current US$ | 588.95 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 719.59 million current US$ | 721.42 million current US$ | 1.83 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Romania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 721.42 million current US$ against 719.59 million current US$ in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 1.83 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
- Romania ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.