Philippines vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal
Philippines
3.83 billion current US$
in 2020
Serbia
5.11 billion current US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
13th
Serbia rank
12th
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 5.11 billion current US$ against 3.83 billion current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 1.27 billion current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Philippines's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 12th of 150 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.14 billion current US$ | 14.72 billion current US$ | 11.58 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 5.66 billion current US$ | 9.86 billion current US$ | 4.20 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 3.83 billion current US$ | 5.11 billion current US$ | 1.27 billion current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Philippines or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 5.11 billion current US$ against 3.83 billion current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Philippines and Serbia?
- 1.27 billion current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
- Philippines ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 12th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.