Norway vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal
Norway
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Norway rank
50th
Peru rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time
- Norway
- Peru
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
Norway ranks 50th and Peru ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 18.51 million current US$ | 53.06 million current US$ | 34.55 million current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 6.15 million current US$ | 166.87 million current US$ | 160.73 million current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Norway or Peru?
- Norway, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Norway and Peru?
- 0 current US$, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Norway and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
- Norway ranks 50th and Peru ranks 50th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.