Mozambique vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal
Mozambique
3.52 billion current US$
in 2020
Serbia
5.11 billion current US$
in 2020
Mozambique rank
14th
Serbia rank
12th
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time
- Mozambique
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 5.11 billion current US$ against 3.52 billion current US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 1.59 billion current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.5 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Mozambique ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 12th of 150 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.44 million current US$ | 14.72 billion current US$ | 14.67 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 8.51 billion current US$ | 9.86 billion current US$ | 1.35 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 3.52 billion current US$ | 5.11 billion current US$ | 1.59 billion current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Mozambique or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 5.11 billion current US$ against 3.52 billion current US$ in Mozambique as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Mozambique and Serbia?
- 1.59 billion current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Mozambique and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
- Mozambique ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 12th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.