Montenegro vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal
Montenegro
283.70 million current US$
in 2020
Zambia
379.39 million current US$
in 2020
Montenegro rank
36th
Zambia rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time
- Montenegro
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 379.39 million current US$ against 283.70 million current US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 95.69 million current US$.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 36th and Zambia ranks 33rd of 150 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 595.45 million current US$ | 5.07 million current US$ | 590.38 million current US$ | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 531.02 million current US$ | 293.89 million current US$ | 237.13 million current US$ | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 283.70 million current US$ | 379.39 million current US$ | 95.69 million current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Montenegro or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 379.39 million current US$ against 283.70 million current US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Montenegro and Zambia?
- 95.69 million current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Montenegro and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
- Montenegro ranks 36th and Zambia ranks 33rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.