Malawi vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal
Malawi
15.35 million current US$
in 2020
Suriname
0 current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
47th
Suriname rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time
- Malawi
- Suriname
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 15.35 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 15.35 million current US$.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 47th and Suriname ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.28 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 33.28 million current US$ | Malawi |
| 2010s | 46.86 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 46.86 million current US$ | Malawi |
| 2020s | 15.35 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 15.35 million current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Malawi or Suriname?
- Malawi, at 15.35 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Malawi and Suriname?
- 15.35 million current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Suriname?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
- Malawi ranks 47th and Suriname ranks 50th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.