Laos vs Latvia: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Laos
0 current US$
in 2020
Latvia
0 current US$
in 2020
Laos rank
50th
Latvia rank
50th

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Laos
  • Latvia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199520072020

How they compare

Laos currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Laos ahead.

Laos ranks 50th and Latvia ranks 50th of 150 countries.

Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.12 million current US$ 0 current US$ 2.12 million current US$ Laos
2000s 225.36 million current US$ 0 current US$ 225.36 million current US$ Laos
2010s 233.17 million current US$ 0 current US$ 233.17 million current US$ Laos
2020s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Laos or Latvia?
Laos, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Laos and Latvia?
0 current US$, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Laos and Latvia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Laos ranks 50th and Latvia ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,872 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed