Brazil vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Brazil
0 current US$
in 2020
Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
50th
Chile rank
50th

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Brazil
  • Chile
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B199520072020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.

Brazil ranks 50th and Chile ranks 50th of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$
2000s 124.01 million current US$ 123.30 million current US$ 701,330 current US$ Brazil
2010s 363.54 million current US$ 848.36 million current US$ 484.82 million current US$ Chile
2020s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Brazil or Chile?
Brazil, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Brazil and Chile?
0 current US$, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Chile rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Brazil ranks 50th and Chile ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,872 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed