Belarus vs Italy: Nonrenewable natural capital, coal

Belarus
0 current US$
in 2020
Italy
0 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
50th
Italy rank
50th

Nonrenewable natural capital, coal over time

  • Belarus
  • Italy
050.0M100.0M150.0M199520072020

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Italy, a difference of 0 current US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 50th and Italy ranks 50th of 150 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Italy Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ 686,068 current US$ 686,068 current US$ Italy
2000s 0 current US$ 27.15 million current US$ 27.15 million current US$ Italy
2010s 0 current US$ 14.60 million current US$ 14.60 million current US$ Italy
2020s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, coal, Belarus or Italy?
Belarus, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Italy as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, coal between Belarus and Italy?
0 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Italy rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, coal?
Belarus ranks 50th and Italy ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, coal (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,872 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed