Jamaica vs Peru: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Jamaica
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 18.7% against 18.7% in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 26th and Peru ranks 25th of 53 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.4% | 18.8% | 9.5% | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 20.1% | 19.3% | 0.8% | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Jamaica or Peru?
- Peru, at 18.7% against 18.7% in Jamaica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Jamaica and Peru?
- 0.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Peru?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Peru rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Jamaica ranks 26th and Peru ranks 25th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/