Guyana vs Mexico: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Guyana
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 14.6% against 10.9% in Guyana, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 34th and Mexico ranks 31st of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4% | 14.0% | 3.3% | Guyana |
| 2010s | 13.0% | 13.3% | 0.3% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Guyana or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 14.6% against 10.9% in Guyana as of 2017.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Guyana and Mexico?
- 3.7%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Mexico?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do Guyana and Mexico rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Guyana ranks 34th and Mexico ranks 31st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/