Armenia vs Lithuania: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Armenia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 65.5% against 34.6% in Lithuania, a difference of 30.9%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.9 times Lithuania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Armenia or Lithuania?
- Armenia, at 65.5% against 34.6% in Lithuania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Armenia and Lithuania?
- 30.9%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2017.
- How do Armenia and Lithuania rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Armenia ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/