Andorra vs Iceland: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Andorra
- Iceland
How they compare
Andorra currently reports 18.2% against 18.1% in Iceland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iceland ahead.
Andorra ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 13th of 65 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Andorra or Iceland?
- Andorra, at 18.2% against 18.1% in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Andorra and Iceland?
- 0.1%, with Andorra ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2017.
- How do Andorra and Iceland rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Andorra ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 13th of 65 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/