Lithuania vs Malta: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure

Lithuania
26.8%
in 2017
Malta
36.5%
in 2017
Lithuania rank
6th
Malta rank
3rd

Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time

  • Lithuania
  • Malta
10203040199820072017

How they compare

Malta currently reports 36.5% against 26.8% in Lithuania, a difference of 9.7%.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malta ahead.

Lithuania ranks 6th and Malta ranks 3rd of 56 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Lithuania or Malta?
Malta, at 36.5% against 26.8% in Lithuania as of 2017.
What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Lithuania and Malta?
9.7%, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malta?
7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
How do Lithuania and Malta rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
Lithuania ranks 6th and Malta ranks 3rd of 56 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Malta: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-public/lithuania/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-public/lithuania/malta/">Lithuania vs Malta: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 576 data points, 1998–2019
Last refreshed

Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/