Burkina Faso vs Dominican Republic: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Burkina Faso
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 16.8% against 16.4% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 19th and Dominican Republic ranks 17th of 64 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.3% | 8.6% | 10.8% | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 7.3% | 9.2% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Burkina Faso or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 16.8% against 16.4% in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Burkina Faso and Dominican Republic?
- 0.4%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Dominican Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Burkina Faso and Dominican Republic rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Burkina Faso ranks 19th and Dominican Republic ranks 17th of 64 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/