Lithuania vs Malta: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Lithuania
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 49.9% against 29.3% in Lithuania, a difference of 20.6%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.7 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 6th and Malta ranks 3rd of 55 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.7% | 9.8% | 19.9% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 28.8% | 27.4% | 1.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Lithuania or Malta?
- Malta, at 49.9% against 29.3% in Lithuania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Lithuania and Malta?
- 20.6%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malta?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2017.
- How do Lithuania and Malta rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Lithuania ranks 6th and Malta ranks 3rd of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/