Ireland vs Kuwait: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Ireland
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 11.7% against 10.6% in Ireland, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 33rd and Kuwait ranks 30th of 55 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.8% | 17.3% | 6.5% | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 10.9% | 13.4% | 2.6% | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Ireland or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 11.7% against 10.6% in Ireland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Ireland and Kuwait?
- 1.1%, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Kuwait?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Ireland and Kuwait rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Ireland ranks 33rd and Kuwait ranks 30th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/