Costa Rica vs Luxembourg: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Costa Rica
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 1.9% against 0.9% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 50th and Luxembourg ranks 49th of 55 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1% | 4.1% | 1.0% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 3.8% | 2.9% | 0.9% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Costa Rica or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 1.9% against 0.9% in Costa Rica as of 2017.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Costa Rica and Luxembourg?
- 1.0%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Luxembourg?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2017.
- How do Costa Rica and Luxembourg rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Costa Rica ranks 50th and Luxembourg ranks 49th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/