Italy vs Republic of Moldova: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure

Italy
26.0%
in 2015
Republic of Moldova
22.4%
in 2015
Italy rank
4th
Republic of Moldova rank
7th

Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time

  • Italy
  • Republic of Moldova
0102030199820062015

How they compare

Italy currently reports 26.0% against 22.4% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 3.6%.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Italy ranks 4th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 28 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 11.4% 17.1% 5.7% Republic of Moldova
2010s 20.4% 19.3% 1.1% Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Italy or Republic of Moldova?
Italy, at 26.0% against 22.4% in Republic of Moldova as of 2015.
What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Italy and Republic of Moldova?
3.6%, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Republic of Moldova?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do Italy and Republic of Moldova rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
Italy ranks 4th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 28 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Republic of Moldova: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-post-secondary/italy/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-post-secondary/italy/moldova/">Italy vs Republic of Moldova: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
28 places, 270 data points, 1995–2019
Last refreshed

Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/