Ireland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Ireland
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 1.3% against 0.0% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 22nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 23rd of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.3% | 0.0% | 4.3% | Ireland |
| 2000s | 4.3% | 12.5% | 8.2% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Ireland or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Ireland, at 1.3% against 0.0% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2017.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Ireland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 1.3%, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2005.
- How do Ireland and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Ireland ranks 22nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 23rd of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/