Australia vs Denmark: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure

Australia
14.1%
in 2017
Denmark
15.7%
in 2014
Australia rank
23rd
Denmark rank
20th

Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time

  • Australia
  • Denmark
510152025199520062017

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 15.7% against 14.1% in Australia, a difference of 1.6%.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Denmark ahead.

Australia ranks 23rd and Denmark ranks 20th of 59 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 12.7% 26.0% 13.3% Denmark
2010s 12.7% 15.9% 3.2% Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Australia or Denmark?
Denmark, at 15.7% against 14.1% in Australia as of 2014.
What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Australia and Denmark?
1.6%, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Denmark?
10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2014.
How do Australia and Denmark rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
Australia ranks 23rd and Denmark ranks 20th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Denmark: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-lower-secondary/australia/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-lower-secondary/australia/denmark/">Australia vs Denmark: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 631 data points, 1995–2019
Last refreshed

Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/