Argentina vs Lithuania: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Argentina
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 21.9% against 21.4% in Argentina, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 59 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Argentina or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 21.9% against 21.4% in Argentina as of 2017.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Argentina and Lithuania?
- 0.5%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Lithuania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Argentina and Lithuania rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/