Latvia vs Suriname: Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and
Latvia
0
in 2018
Suriname
0
in 2018
Latvia rank
61st
Suriname rank
61st
Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and over time
- Latvia
- Suriname
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 against 0 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 61st of 189 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0.02 | 0.02 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.002 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and, Latvia or Suriname?
- Latvia, at 0 against 0 in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and between Latvia and Suriname?
- 0, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and?
- Latvia ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 61st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.