Ecuador vs Namibia: Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and
Ecuador
0
in 2018
Namibia
0
in 2018
Ecuador rank
61st
Namibia rank
61st
Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 against 0 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 61st and Namibia ranks 61st of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.004 | 0.018 | 0.014 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.005 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.0078 | 0 | 0.0078 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at 0 against 0 in Namibia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and?
- Ecuador ranks 61st and Namibia ranks 61st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.