Congo vs South Africa: Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and
Congo
0.44
in 2018
South Africa
0.52
in 2018
Congo rank
28th
South Africa rank
26th
Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and over time
- Congo
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.52 against 0.44 in Congo, a difference of 0.08.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South Africa ahead.
Congo ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 26th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.366 | 1.05 | 0.688 | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0.269 | 0.227 | 0.042 | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.3578 | 0.1889 | 0.1689 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and, Congo or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.52 against 0.44 in Congo as of 2018.
- What is the difference in non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and between Congo and South Africa?
- 0.08, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for non-co2 ghg emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and?
- Congo ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 26th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Non-CO2 GHG emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.