Afghanistan vs Kiribati: Nitrogen use efficiency
Afghanistan
59.5%
in 2014
Kiribati
58.6%
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
76th
Kiribati rank
79th
Nitrogen use efficiency over time
- Afghanistan
- Kiribati
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 59.5% against 58.6% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 76th and Kiribati ranks 79th of 205 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 71.7% | 77.1% | 5.4% | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 68.1% | 83.9% | 15.8% | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 52.3% | 92.8% | 40.4% | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 61.5% | 94.3% | 32.8% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 58.1% | 109.7% | 51.6% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 51.3% | 51.1% | 0.2% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen use efficiency, Afghanistan or Kiribati?
- Afghanistan, at 59.5% against 58.6% in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nitrogen use efficiency between Afghanistan and Kiribati?
- 0.9%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Kiribati?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan and Kiribati rank globally for nitrogen use efficiency?
- Afghanistan ranks 76th and Kiribati ranks 79th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lassaletta et al. (2014) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Nitrogen use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is the ratio between nitrogen inputs and output. A NUE of 40% means that only 40% of nitrogen inputs are converted into nitrogen in the form of crops.