North Macedonia vs Uruguay: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
North Macedonia
0 Cases
in 2024
Uruguay
0 Cases
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
108th
Uruguay rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- North Macedonia
- Uruguay
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Uruguay, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Uruguay ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 108th and Uruguay ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.62 Cases | 2.38 Cases | 0.75 Cases | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.5 Cases | 0.9 Cases | 0.4 Cases | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.4286 Cases | 0.7143 Cases | 0.2857 Cases | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0.4 Cases | 0.4 Cases | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, North Macedonia or Uruguay?
- North Macedonia, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 0 Cases, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Uruguay rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- North Macedonia ranks 108th and Uruguay ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.