Nicaragua vs San Marino: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Nicaragua
0 Cases
in 2024
San Marino
0 Cases
in 2024
Nicaragua rank
108th
San Marino rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Nicaragua
- San Marino
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in San Marino, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 108th and San Marino ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 28.83 Cases | 0 Cases | 28.83 Cases | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | 153 Cases | 0 Cases | 153 Cases | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 10.4 Cases | 0.4 Cases | 10 Cases | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 5.29 Cases | 0 Cases | 5.29 Cases | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 1 Cases | 0 Cases | 1 Cases | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Nicaragua or San Marino?
- Nicaragua, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Nicaragua and San Marino?
- 0 Cases, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and San Marino?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Nicaragua and San Marino rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Nicaragua ranks 108th and San Marino ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.