Mali vs Thailand: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Mali
15 Cases
in 2024
Thailand
15 Cases
in 2024
Mali rank
49th
Thailand rank
49th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Mali
- Thailand
How they compare
Mali currently reports 15 Cases against 15 Cases in Thailand, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Thailand ahead.
Mali ranks 49th and Thailand ranks 49th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 452.2 Cases | 1,795 Cases | 1,343 Cases | Thailand |
| 1980s | 442.8 Cases | 1,481 Cases | 1,038 Cases | Thailand |
| 1990s | 202.33 Cases | 532 Cases | 329.67 Cases | Thailand |
| 2000s | 71.22 Cases | 173.11 Cases | 101.89 Cases | Thailand |
| 2010s | 42.88 Cases | 86 Cases | 43.12 Cases | Thailand |
| 2020s | 9.33 Cases | 5 Cases | 4.33 Cases | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Mali or Thailand?
- Mali, at 15 Cases against 15 Cases in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Mali and Thailand?
- 0 Cases, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Thailand?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Thailand rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Mali ranks 49th and Thailand ranks 49th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.