Macao vs Nauru: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus

Macao
0 Cases
in 2024
Nauru
0 Cases
in 2019
Macao rank
108th
Nauru rank
108th

Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time

  • Macao
  • Nauru
0246197720002024

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Nauru, a difference of 0 Cases.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Macao ahead.

Macao ranks 108th and Nauru ranks 108th of 210 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Nauru Difference Ahead
1970s 2.33 Cases 0 Cases 2.33 Cases Macao
1980s 2 Cases 0 Cases 2 Cases Macao
1990s 0.5 Cases 1 Cases 0.5 Cases Nauru
2000s 0 Cases 0.1429 Cases 0.1429 Cases Nauru
2010s 0 Cases 0 Cases 0 Cases

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Macao or Nauru?
Macao, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Nauru as of 2024.
What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Macao and Nauru?
0 Cases, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Nauru?
24 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2019.
How do Macao and Nauru rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
Macao ranks 108th and Nauru ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Unit
Cases
Source
World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
210 places, 8,305 data points, 1974–2024
Last refreshed

The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.