Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Luxembourg
0 Cases
in 2024
Rwanda
0 Cases
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
108th
Rwanda rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Luxembourg
- Rwanda
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Rwanda, a difference of 0 Cases.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 108th and Rwanda ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 Cases | 77.6 Cases | 76.6 Cases | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.7 Cases | 86.1 Cases | 85.4 Cases | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 0.3333 Cases | 18.67 Cases | 18.33 Cases | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 Cases | 17.14 Cases | 17.14 Cases | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 Cases | 1.33 Cases | 1.33 Cases | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 2.2 Cases | 2.2 Cases | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Luxembourg or Rwanda?
- Luxembourg, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Luxembourg and Rwanda?
- 0 Cases, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Rwanda?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Rwanda rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Luxembourg ranks 108th and Rwanda ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.