North Korea vs Serbia: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
North Korea
0 Cases
in 2022
Serbia
0 Cases
in 2024
North Korea rank
108th
Serbia rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- North Korea
- Serbia
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Serbia, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Serbia ahead.
North Korea ranks 108th and Serbia ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Korea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 252 Cases | 173 Cases | 79 Cases | North Korea |
| 1980s | 546.2 Cases | 86.5 Cases | 459.7 Cases | North Korea |
| 1990s | 1.83 Cases | 27 Cases | 25.17 Cases | Serbia |
| 2000s | 0 Cases | 9.62 Cases | 9.62 Cases | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 Cases | 2.56 Cases | 2.56 Cases | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 1 Cases | 1 Cases | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, North Korea or Serbia?
- North Korea, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between North Korea and Serbia?
- 0 Cases, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Serbia?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2022.
- How do North Korea and Serbia rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- North Korea ranks 108th and Serbia ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.