Kiribati vs Montserrat: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Kiribati
0 Cases
in 2023
Montserrat
0 Cases
in 2024
Kiribati rank
108th
Montserrat rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Kiribati
- Montserrat
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Montserrat, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 108th and Montserrat ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Montserrat | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4 Cases | 1 Cases | 3 Cases | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 2.7 Cases | 0 Cases | 2.7 Cases | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 9.2 Cases | 0 Cases | 9.2 Cases | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
| 2010s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Kiribati or Montserrat?
- Kiribati, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Montserrat as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Kiribati and Montserrat?
- 0 Cases, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Montserrat?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Montserrat rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Kiribati ranks 108th and Montserrat ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.