Hong Kong vs Suriname: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Hong Kong
0 Cases
in 2024
Suriname
0 Cases
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
108th
Suriname rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Hong Kong
- Suriname
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Suriname, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 108th and Suriname ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 25 Cases | 0 Cases | 25 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 20.2 Cases | 2.6 Cases | 17.6 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 18.2 Cases | 4.9 Cases | 13.3 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 2.67 Cases | 1.17 Cases | 1.5 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 1 Cases | 0.5714 Cases | 0.4286 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.6 Cases | 0.2 Cases | 0.4 Cases | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Hong Kong or Suriname?
- Hong Kong, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Hong Kong and Suriname?
- 0 Cases, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Suriname?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and Suriname rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Hong Kong ranks 108th and Suriname ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.