Hong Kong vs Oman: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Hong Kong
0 Cases
in 2024
Oman
0 Cases
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
108th
Oman rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Hong Kong
- Oman
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Oman, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Oman ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 108th and Oman ranks 108th of 210 regions.
Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and Oman in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 27.8 Cases | 98.6 Cases | 70.8 Cases | Oman |
| 1980s | 20.2 Cases | 39.7 Cases | 19.5 Cases | Oman |
| 1990s | 18.2 Cases | 5.6 Cases | 12.6 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 2.67 Cases | 2.83 Cases | 0.1667 Cases | Oman |
| 2010s | 0.8889 Cases | 0.7778 Cases | 0.1111 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.6 Cases | 0 Cases | 0.6 Cases | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Hong Kong or Oman?
- Hong Kong, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Hong Kong and Oman?
- 0 Cases, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Oman?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and Oman rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Hong Kong ranks 108th and Oman ranks 108th of 210 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.