Hong Kong vs Monaco: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Hong Kong
0 Cases
in 2024
Monaco
0 Cases
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
108th
Monaco rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Hong Kong
- Monaco
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Monaco, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 108th and Monaco ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 34.83 Cases | 0 Cases | 34.83 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 20.2 Cases | 0 Cases | 20.2 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 22 Cases | 0 Cases | 22 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 3 Cases | 0 Cases | 3 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 2.5 Cases | 0.5 Cases | 2 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 1 Cases | 0 Cases | 1 Cases | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Hong Kong or Monaco?
- Hong Kong, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Monaco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Hong Kong and Monaco?
- 0 Cases, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Monaco?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and Monaco rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Hong Kong ranks 108th and Monaco ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.