Hong Kong vs Libya: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Hong Kong
0 Cases
in 2024
Libya
0 Cases
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
108th
Libya rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Hong Kong
- Libya
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Libya, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 108th and Libya ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 4 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 37 Cases | 48.2 Cases | 11.2 Cases | Libya |
| 1980s | 20.2 Cases | 19.8 Cases | 0.4 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 19.43 Cases | 3.14 Cases | 16.29 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 1.5 Cases | 0.75 Cases | 0.75 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 2 Cases | 0 Cases | 2 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Hong Kong or Libya?
- Hong Kong, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Hong Kong and Libya?
- 0 Cases, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Libya?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and Libya rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Hong Kong ranks 108th and Libya ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.