Ecuador vs Mali: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Ecuador
13 Cases
in 2024
Mali
15 Cases
in 2024
Ecuador rank
52nd
Mali rank
49th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Ecuador
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 15 Cases against 13 Cases in Ecuador, a difference of 2 Cases.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Mali ahead.
Ecuador ranks 52nd and Mali ranks 49th of 210 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 146.6 Cases | 452.2 Cases | 305.6 Cases | Mali |
| 1980s | 141.3 Cases | 442.8 Cases | 301.5 Cases | Mali |
| 1990s | 124.86 Cases | 178.71 Cases | 53.86 Cases | Mali |
| 2000s | 23 Cases | 77 Cases | 54 Cases | Mali |
| 2010s | 29.56 Cases | 39.22 Cases | 9.67 Cases | Mali |
| 2020s | 7.75 Cases | 9 Cases | 1.25 Cases | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Ecuador or Mali?
- Mali, at 15 Cases against 13 Cases in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Ecuador and Mali?
- 2 Cases, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mali?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Mali rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Ecuador ranks 52nd and Mali ranks 49th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.