Cuba vs Hong Kong: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Cuba
0 Cases
in 2024
Hong Kong
0 Cases
in 2024
Cuba rank
108th
Hong Kong rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Cuba
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 108th and Hong Kong ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 56.67 Cases | 34.83 Cases | 21.83 Cases | Cuba |
| 1980s | 14.6 Cases | 20.2 Cases | 5.6 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 4 Cases | 18.2 Cases | 14.2 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 2 Cases | 2.67 Cases | 0.6667 Cases | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 1.11 Cases | 0.8889 Cases | 0.2222 Cases | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0.6 Cases | 0.6 Cases | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Cuba or Hong Kong?
- Cuba, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Hong Kong as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Cuba and Hong Kong?
- 0 Cases, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Hong Kong?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Hong Kong rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Cuba ranks 108th and Hong Kong ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.