Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Costa Rica
0 Cases
in 2024
Mongolia
0 Cases
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
108th
Mongolia rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Mongolia, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 108th and Mongolia ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 47.33 Cases | 1.33 Cases | 46 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 8.2 Cases | 1 Cases | 7.2 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 2.22 Cases | 2.22 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
| 2000s | 0.8 Cases | 1.4 Cases | 0.6 Cases | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.5714 Cases | 0 Cases | 0.5714 Cases | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 0 Cases, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Costa Rica ranks 108th and Mongolia ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.