Cook Islands vs Nauru: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Cook Islands
0 Cases
in 2019
Nauru
0 Cases
in 2019
Cook Islands rank
108th
Nauru rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Cook Islands
- Nauru
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Nauru, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 108th and Nauru ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3333 Cases | 0 Cases | 0.3333 Cases | Cook Islands |
| 1980s | 0.1111 Cases | 0 Cases | 0.1111 Cases | Cook Islands |
| 1990s | 0 Cases | 1 Cases | 1 Cases | Nauru |
| 2000s | 0 Cases | 0.1111 Cases | 0.1111 Cases | Nauru |
| 2010s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Cook Islands or Nauru?
- Cook Islands, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Nauru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 0 Cases, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2019.
- How do Cook Islands and Nauru rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Cook Islands ranks 108th and Nauru ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.