Botswana vs Grenada: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Botswana
0 Cases
in 2024
Grenada
0 Cases
in 2024
Botswana rank
108th
Grenada rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Botswana
- Grenada
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Grenada, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 108th and Grenada ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 17 Cases | 3.6 Cases | 13.4 Cases | Botswana |
| 1980s | 7.78 Cases | 1.44 Cases | 6.33 Cases | Botswana |
| 1990s | 0.6 Cases | 0.2 Cases | 0.4 Cases | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0 Cases | 0.4444 Cases | 0.4444 Cases | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Botswana or Grenada?
- Botswana, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Botswana and Grenada?
- 0 Cases, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Grenada?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Grenada rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Botswana ranks 108th and Grenada ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.