Bhutan vs Suriname: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Bhutan
0 Cases
in 2024
Suriname
0 Cases
in 2024
Bhutan rank
108th
Suriname rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Bhutan
- Suriname
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Suriname, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 108th and Suriname ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7.5 Cases | 0 Cases | 7.5 Cases | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 31.7 Cases | 2.6 Cases | 29.1 Cases | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 8.44 Cases | 5 Cases | 3.44 Cases | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 6.6 Cases | 1 Cases | 5.6 Cases | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 1.14 Cases | 0.5714 Cases | 0.5714 Cases | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0.2 Cases | 0.2 Cases | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Bhutan or Suriname?
- Bhutan, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Bhutan and Suriname?
- 0 Cases, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Suriname?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Suriname rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Bhutan ranks 108th and Suriname ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.